In John Updikes novel Rogers Version a character says:
Whenever theology touches science, it gets burned. In the sixteenth century astronomy, in the seventeenth microbiology, in the eighteenth geology and paleontology, in the nineteenth Darwins biology all grotesquely extended the world-frame and sent churchmen scurrying for cover in ever smaller, more shadowy nooks, little gloomy ambiguous caves in the psyche where even now neurology is cruelly harrying them, gouging them out from the multifolded brain like wood lice from under the lumber pile.
Pope John Paul II wrote in 1988 that:
By encouraging openness between the Church and the scientific communities, we are not envisioning a disciplinary unity between theology and science like that which exists within a given scientific field or within theology proper. As dialogue and common searching continue, there will be growth towards mutual understanding and a gradual uncovering of common concerns which will provide the basis for future research and discussion. Exactly what form that will take must be left to the future. What is important, as we have already stressed, is that the dialogue should continue and grow in depth and scope. In the process we must overcome every regressive tendency to a unilateral reductionism, to fear, and to self-imposed isolation.
The character in Updikes novel talks of theology in progressive and inevitable retreat before the dominance of science. There is a conflict in which one subject is overwhelming the other, forcing it off its territory. See the conflict or warfare hypothesis. The tone of the Popes letter is very different, implying a common territory on which may take place exploration and dialogue. See possibilities for dialogue. The Pope renounces the idea that theology might seek to preserve itself from the harryings of science by seeking isolation.
These two extreme viewpoints will be with us throughout this look at the interactions between the sciences and religion.
To explore the range of possible interactions further see typologies relating science and religion.
To understand more about how science and theology function in the popular imagination see the words science and theology in popular usage.
To clarify how the science-religion relationship can be understood see:
Different sciences - different relationships, A special relationship? and The metaphor of the maps.
To explore how the debate has developed in recent years go to key figures and developments in the science-religion debate.
| Topic Index |
More: The Conflict or Warfare Hypothesis |
| Show Related Topics |
Email
link | Feedback | Contributed by: Dr. Christopher Southgate
Source: God, Humanity and the Cosmos (T&T Clark, 1999)